8. Vaccine Infrastructures
Current vaccine development is a highly collaborative effort, in which public-private partnerships for co- development or licensing have become the standard business model33 34 35 and special effort within the European community has been made to harmonise access to the Biomedical Research Infrastructures (RIs) relevant to vaccines R&D (i.e. EATRIS, ECRIN, BBMRI, INSTRUCT & ELIXIR). Consequently, the vaccine R&D expertise and facilities available in Europe provide an outstanding opportunity for further advancing the development of a favourable eco-system for vaccine innovation in Europe.
GAPS AND CHALLENGES
A recent analysis of R&D patent and publication networks over 10 years shows that Europe remains a collection of national innovation systems and that cross-border collaboration is below expectation for an integrated European research area. The relatively recent introduction of biomedical RIs such as ECRIN, EATRIS and BBMRI (all of which formally received ERIC status in late 2013 or 2014), has allowed the establishment of permanent legal entities with pan-European scope of activity. These RIs already deliver high quality services and access to vaccine infrastructure, but their relatively recent establishment gives rise to the need to further embed their activities in the vaccines research arena and promote innovation in Europe and beyond. Consequently, the vaccine R&D expertise available in Europe, combined with facilities and infrastructures existing at the level of EU Member States, provides Europe with the chance to further drive the development of an environment which nurtures vaccine innovation. This should include the establishment of a seamless European infrastructure pipeline dedicated to vaccine R&D. Several successful initiatives already exist to stimulate and facilitate effective public-private collaboration such as largest existing Innovative Medicines Initiative in the non-competitive research sphere and research infrastructures such as the EATRIS ERIC. These should be built upon to work on bottlenecks, including lack of legal and business development expertise within academia, industry investments shifting away from early research towards later development and the limited infrastructure available for post-licensure studies on effectiveness and safety of vaccines.
As raised during the IPROVE SMEs and R&D workshops, there is a need for promoting access to
cutting edge technology platforms and innovative services serving the R&D need for translational and clinical development:
- Antigen selection and vaccine design
- Immunisation technologies
- Clinical development of vaccines
- Manufacturing & quality control
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EU LEVEL ACTION
- Develop the network of existing facilities and expertise across Europe
- Maintain, upgrade or develop new infrastructures in areas where gaps exist or capacity is insufficient, as following:
-
- Antigen selection and vaccine design and immunisation technologies
- Genomics and bioinformatics facilities
- Repository and collections (biobanks, well-characterised pathogen strains)
- High throughput protein production and crystallography facilities
- Animal facilities including bio-containment facilities (BSL-3 and 4), and state-of-the art platforms including histopathology, immune monitoring and imaging for small animal models (e.g. conventional, modified and humanised mice), and large animals, e.g. pigs and non-human primates. Develop and allow access to libraries (monoclonal antibodies)
- Immunisation technologies
- Live vectors platform
- Adjuvant platform
- Delivery systems/nanotechnologies
- Formulation platform
- Infrastructure for human challenge models
- Manufacturing and quality control
- Secure clear guidance for GMP level for manufacturing and quality control of IP’s for phase I-II
- Establish funding schemes that fund the GMP manufacturing of vaccines for their testing in clinical trials
up to phase 2 - Allow or facilitate the access to infrastructure required for GMP manufacturing, on the basis of current
capacities and bottlenecks - Organise and provide funding for training programmes in GMP manufacturing, including the establishment of or access to GMP training facilities
- Clinical development of vaccines
- Provide ethical and regulatory knowledge
- Map centers with methodological competences
- Map volunteers/specific populations
- Identify or develop cohorts (registries)
- Develop cross border connection able to rapidly set-up a trial and recruit patient volunteers
- Clinical imaging
- Biomarkers for stratification and follow-up of vaccines
- Facilities for performing controlled challenge studies in humans, including BSL2 containment
- Clinical trial centers that can perform clinical studies in a hospital setting, and have access to facilities for standardised immune-monitoring, imaging , laboratory testing, and functional monitoring of physiological parameters
- Establish a central platform for measuring the purity of GMP vaccine batches e. g. measurement of host cell proteins
- Establish link between biomarker working groups with potency assay development
- Promote harmonisation/standardisation among facilities
- Foster cross talk with the veterinary field to make use of the experience previously acquired by both specialties
- Foster cross talk with leading experts and nutrition companies in Europe that can support drive research and development in some of the microbiota applications
- Data integration and analysis:
-
- Alignment of methods, analysis and tools
- Storage and integration of data from preclinical and clinical sources
Research infrastructures |
GAPS & CHALLENGES | Recommendations | |
Enabling an optimal academia – industry collaboration process is a key challenge |
|
|
Reinforce vaccines research infrastructures |
|
|
Clinical development of vaccines: lack of support to clinical research infrastructure |
|
|
Manufacturing & quality control: need to improve GMP manufacturing capabilities |
|
34 PricewaterhouseCoopers Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences. (2009) – Pharma 2020: Challenging business models – Which path will you take?
35 PricewaterhouseCoopers Pharmaceutical and Life Sciences. (2010) – Biotech reinvented – Where do you go from here?